HUILI SCHOOL SHANGHAI LIBRARY上海浦东新区民办惠立学校图书馆 |
As preparation for their first reflection session, students should do the following.
source from: IB
Reflection is a continual process. If you are constantly considering the decisions you are making in the extended essay (EE) process, you are better able to avoid the common pitfalls of independent research. Reflection also helps you plan, allowing you to monitor your progress.
The following table identifies three stages in the review process and the kinds of questions you can usefully consider at each. It also suggests what evidence you might use in your reflection sessions to demonstrate your progress and learning.
source from: IB
Stage |
Types of questions you may ask yourself |
Evidence from my researcher’s reflection space |
Initial: Planning stages |
|
|
Background reading stage |
|
|
The Reflections on planning and progress form enables examiners to gain an insight into students’ thinking processes while researching and writing the EE. The examiners are looking to see how students’ thinking and skills have developed during this time.
The assessment criterion E (engagement) will be applied in the assessment of students’ reflections. Representing 18% of the total grade, this is an extremely important part of the overall EE assessment.
It is important to stress with students that examiners want to gain an insight into their thinking processes throughout their experience with the EE. Criterion E assesses the student’s engagement with their research focus and the research process. It will be applied by the examiner at the end of the assessment of the essay, after considering the student’s RPPF.
This criterion assesses the student’s engagement with their research focus and the research process. It will be applied by the examiner at the end of the assessment of the essay, and is based solely on the candidate’s reflections as detailed on the RPPF, with the supervisory comments and extended essay itself as context. Only the first 500 words are assessable.
Level |
Descriptor of strands and indicators |
0 |
The work does not reach a standard outlined by the descriptors, an RPPF has not been submitted, or the RPPF has been submitted in a language other than that of the essay. |
1–2 |
Engagement is limited.
|
3–4 |
Engagement is good.
|
5–6 |
Engagement is excellent.
|
Handy Links:
Criterion E: Engagement
What It Means: This criterion assesses the student’s engagement with their research focus and the research process. It will be applied by the examiner at the end of the assessment of the essay, after considering the student’s RPPF (Reflections on planning and progress form). |
Questions to ask:
(Source: IBO.org)
Schedule the 1st formal reflection meeting with your supervisor by March 1
Go through this webpage and review the PPT titled 'How to Write the Best EE Reflections' on MB
Complete first reflection in RPPF and submit on MB by March 4
3 Total Reflections
Total word count for all 3 Reflections (1st Meeting, Interim Meeting, and Viva Voce) = 500 Words
Must have met with your Supervisor prior to writing/posting your reflection to Managebac
Suggestion: Write them on a Microsoft Word so you can use the Word Count, Formatting, and Editing tools you need then copy/paste to Managebac.
Reflections are graded using criterion E: Engagement, earning you a maximum of 6 points for your EE.
Language: Complete your 3 reflections in the same language as the EE
While these suggestions aren’t fail-proof, these sentence starters might helps to encourage more reflection and evaluation, rather than description: